Orhan Pamuk was born in Istanbul in 1952 and from his childhood until the age of 22, he devoted himself largely to painting and dreamed of becoming an artist. After graduating from the secular American Robert College in Istanbul he studied architecture at Istanbul Technical University for 3 years, but abandoned the course when he gave up his ambition to become an architect and artist. He went on to graduate in journalism from Istanbul University, but never worked as journalist. At the age of 23 Pamuk decided to become a novelist, and giving up everything else retreated into his flat and began to write.
Apart from three years in New York, Orhan Pamuk has spent all his life in the same streets and district of Istanbul, and he now lives in the building where he was raised. Pamuk has been writing novels for 30 years and never done any other job except writing.
Have you ever heard about motherland, mothertongue, mother country, mothercraft, mother earth, mother goddess, motherland, mother lode, mother sea, and mother river?
At least one of them you ever heard.
So, why they call it mothertongue instead of fathertongue?
Because father seldom speak. (I'm Joking. It's funny, right?)
No, no.. Mother is just like an angel, she's too precious, we should appreciate her. I think that's their way to show their gratitude.
Talking about mother, by the way today is December 22. What's so important about today?
Today in Indonesia we're celebrating Mother's day. I found that in many countries most commonly in the months of March or May, such as Bolivia, Middle East courties (mostly), Nepal, France, Nicaragua, etc.
What is Mother's Day?
A day of the year on which mothers are particularly honoured by their children. (oxford dictionary)
Mother's Day History
Back to the ancient Greeks and Romans, who held festivals in honor of the mother goddesses Rhea and Cybele, but the clearest modern precedent for Mother's Day is the early Christian festival known as "Mothering Sunday". Once a major tradition in the UK and parts of Europe, this celebration fell on the 4th Sunday in Lent and was originally seen as a time when the faithful would return to their "mother church"-the main church in the vicinity of their home -for a special service. Over time the Mothering Sunday tradition shifted into a more secular holiday, and children would present their mothers with flowers and other tokens of appreciation. This custom eventually faded in popularity before merging with theAmerican Mother's Day in the 1930s and 1940s.
Mother's Day in Indonesia
Mother's Day in Indonesia plays a special role in Indonesian history, culture, and society. In fact, it's not just for mothers but for the entire women community. It's observed as a national holiday in Indonesia and is celebrated anually on December 22. This day owes its origin to the first All Indonesian Women's Congress that was held on the same day in 1928. The Congress intended to improve women's rights in education and marriage. However, the idea of making it an official celebration was carried out a year later, during 1938. In 1959, this day was officially declared as Mother's Day after it was signed by Indonesian first president, Mr. Soekarno under Presidential Decree No. 316.
Local name is Hari Ibu. Which Hari means day and Ibu means mother.
How are Indonesians celebrating Hari Ibu?
According to Women's congress, Hari Ibu was aimed to celebrate the spirit of Indonesian women and improve the condition of the nation. But, it's now celebrated for expressing love and gratitude to mothers apart from the traditional belief. On this day, it is a customary practice to send gifts, flowers, and greeting cards to mothers. Moreover, some organizations hold parties or competitions, like cooking competition, photography or flower decorating.
I've been in a relationship with a guy for 26 months. It's a long distance relationship. He is in Indonesia and I'm in Turkey. We didn't mind about the time zone. We appreciated and supported each other. We didn't have any problems in our relationship, but the problem was relationship itself.
Months ago my friend told me about Ust. Felix siaw's book, Udah Putusin Aja! (Let's break up!). This book is all about boy-girl or man-woman relationships in Islam. It says relationships before marriage between man-woman are haraam. Why haraam? Because they lead you to zina.
I said, but how could we're doing zina since we're thousand miles away?
This book has the answer of my question.
It was narrated from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah has decreed for every son of Adam his share of zina, which he will inevitably commit. The zina of the eyes is looking, the zina of tongue is speaking, one may wishing and desire, and the private parts confirm that or deny it."
We might zina through eyes, heart or tongue. For example, when we're skypee-ing or sending photos, I saw him, it's zina of the eyes. Actually it's Ok as long as without any desires on it. But, when someone fell in love, they forgot about it.
"Tapi aku mencintainya. Tiara masih tetap bisa mencintai Allah meskipun dia pacaran denganku. Toh, cinta di hatinya masih tetap untuk Dia."
Miftakh menghela napas panjang. "Sekarang aku tanya, bagaimana jika seseorang yang sangat kamu cintai, ternyata mencintai pria lain?" Atau, dekat dengan pria lain?"
"Tentu saja, aku akan cemburu."
"Begitu pula dengan Dia. Allah pun akan sangat cemburu ketika seseorang yang mencintai-Nya malah memiliki cinta lain yang tidak halal di hati orang tersebut. Meeskipun hanya sedikit." Jelas Miftakh.
(Udah Putusin Aja, page 166)
The story is about a girl who has a relationship with a boy and she says she also loves Allah. Then her friend, Miftakh says, "If you love someone, and someone you loved loves another man. How do you feel?" "I'm jealous." Then so does Allah. Allah really jealous when someone who loves Him has haraam love though it's little.
Our societies sometimes judge us for being single. Actually, it's Ok being single since it doesn't break the law.It's not wasting your time for unimportant things, drama and so on. You could focus on your goals, then one day if you are ready to marry her and it will be a happy ending.
Few
months ago, after Jurassic World had been released, some of my friends and I
were talking about the older sequel of Jurassic World, Jurassic Park. It's been
ages since the old one released. Then I found one of Crichton's work, Congo.
I've read it, it's a recommendable book. If you love adventure and this book
really fits you.
Author : Michael Crichton
Country : United States
Language : English
Genre : Science fiction, adventure novel
Year : 1980
Pages : 348
Plot summary
The novel starts with an abrupt end to an diamond
expedition in the legendary lost city of Zinj sent by Earth Resource Technology
Services Inc. in the dense rain forests of Congo (Zaire) when the team is
attacked and killed by an unkown creature and all contact with them is lost.
Luckily there is a camera taken a video and trasmitted to the base
station in Houston. In the video, it shows a peculiar race of grey haired
gorillas-like who they believe as murders.
Our main character, Dr. Karen Ross, supervisor of
ERTS asked Dr. Peter Elliot, a primatologist who trained a gorilla named
Amy which be able to speak sign language, about the video. Elliot and Amy both
shocked, Amy said gorillas don't kill people. Then Ross decides to take another
expedition to Congo to get the blue diamonds and to prove her boss that she as
a genius woman could join the expedition. Because of the bewilderment over
this incident she contacts Dr. Elliot to find out what this gorilla is. She
tells him that their going to the Congo and he wants to come and bring Amy, his
gorilla. Amy has been experiencing bad dreams because of her past which is
unknown to Dr. Ross. She begins finger painting which helps her sleep at ease
because tries to banish the dreams onto paper. Elliot realizes she wants to go
to the jungle because all the her paintings are of it. The expedition leaves
quickly because there is a competing company that is also making its way to the
Congo to get the blue diamonds, which are an amazing source of energy.
The expedition is set to meet Charles Munro, the
best guide there is, to guide them through the Congo. They discussed business
matters and quickly headed to Nairobi. From Nairobi they took their final plane
to go to the Congo. At that time a civil war had started in Africa and both
sides were shooting everything, including the expedition’s plane. Every one had
to take a parachute and jump out of the plane. This was a major delay in the
time the expedition had to beat the competition to the diamond site. The
expedition: Ross, Elliot, Munro, Amy, and some African men; have to walk the
rest of the way to the diamond site. On their way they encounter many dangers
like: cannibalistic tribes, angry hippos, crocodiles, and a volcano ready to
burst. As they are walking through the jungle Ross is informed on her computer
that the competition has already reached the site and there is no point to
continue. Later on they find the competitions camp site destroyed and all the
people are dead. During their journey they have an encounter with mountain
gorillas. Amy runs of with them because she thinks the group is mad at her.
After all the troubles and danger they finally arrive at a place to make camp,
which turns out to be the lost city of Zinj which contains the blue
diamonds.
They are very excited to have made such a great
archeological discovery and go exploring the city for the rest of the day. At
night they set up and electric fence, sensor guns, and sensor lasers. This is
their first encounter with the gray killer gorillas. The gorillas showed signs
of intelligence by attacking different parts of the electric fence to get in,
they also wheezed to one another and used hand signals, which served as a
language. The next day while studying paintings in one of the houses of the
city they discovered the story behind the city. The city has diamond mines under
it and they trained gorillas to be like watch dogs to guard the mines. These
“watch dogs” turned on their masters and these killer apes rule the city. The
team dug a moat around the camp because it is known that no gorilla will cross
even the smallest body of water. That night the gorillas came and the same
wheezing noises where heard used a tree trunk as a bridge over the moat and
some of them made a distraction while others used a stick to lift open the
fence and kill some of the African people. Later the team studied the body of
one of the dead animals. It was a little smaller than a gorilla and weighed
less and it’s fur color was gray. The next night the same thing happened: more
gorillas slipped in unnoticed, killed some of the African people, and made a
clean exit. The next day Amy returned to the camp site and told Elliot that
these gray gorillas are bad creatures and that she could understand them a
little. Elliot thought of a plan, he and Amy went to the lair of these gorillas
and focused on one. Amy would explain to Elliot what each noise meant. By
the end of the day they had down the meaning of a few words. Elliot made a tape
with the words: GO AWAY, NO COME, and BAD HERE. As the gorillas attacked that
night he played the message and they all left. The plan had worked. The next
day the volcano was ready to blow which meant they had to leave quickly. On
their way a cannibal tribe attacked them. They managed to escape in a hot air
balloon and Amy was set free and lived with a gorilla troop. Ross got her blue
diamonds and went home happy.
I was surfing the internet and on my social media, I found some people were debating their arguments. It's like they're making the 3rd war, because it's like never ending comments. I looked what they're talking about and through their comments I found some logical fallacies.
Anyway, what is logical fallacy?
Logical fallacy is a fallacy in logical argumentation.
A. Fallacies of Distraction
Ad baculum (‘veiled threat’): L. "to the stick:"
Definition: threatening an opponent if they won’t agree with you;
Ex: "If you don’t agree with me you’ll be sorry!"
Ad hominem (‘personal attack’; ‘poisoning the well’): L. "to the man;"
Def: attacking a person’s habits, personality, or reputation;
Ex: "His argument must be false because people say he’s a liar."
Ad ignorantium (‘appeal to ignorance’): L. “to ignorance”
Def: arguing that if something hasn’t been proved false, then it must be true;
Ex: "U.F.Os must exist, because no one can prove that they don’t."
Ad populum (‘popularity appeal’): L. "to the people"
Def: appealing to the emotions and/or prejudices of a group;
Ex: "Everyone believes in global warming so it must be true."
Bulverism: (named for C.S. Lewis’s imaginary character: Ezekiel Bulver)
Def: attacking a person’s identity (race/gender/religion);
Ex: "You only think that because you’re a (man/woman; Black/White;
Chronological Snobbery (Ad annis: L. “to the years”)
Def: appealing to the age of something as proof or disproof of its truth;
Ex: "Sin and hell are so old-fashioned—how can you believe such antiquated
ideas? Today you should realize that you’ve got to believe in yourself.”
Ipse dixit (‘false authority’): L. "He said it himself"
Def: appealing to an illegitimate authority;
Ex: "Global warming must be true because the Vice President said so."
Red herring (‘changing the subject’):
Def: diverting attention; changing the subject to avoid the point of the argument;
Ex: "You can’t accuse our public schools of failing. That’s unpatriotic!"
Straw Man (‘misrepresentation’):
Def: misrepresenting the opponent's argument; exaggerating or oversimplifying
Ex: "Einstein's theory must be false! It makes everything relative--even truth!"
Tu quoque: L. "You also"
Def: defending yourself by attacking the opponent
Ex: "Who are you to condemn anyone? Do you claim to be perfect?"
B. Fallacies of Ambiguity
Accent:
Def: confusing the argument by changing the emphasis in the sentence
Ex: “You said that you were IN FAVOR of the legislation!” “No, I said
I was in favor of legislation THAT WORKS!”
Amphiboly: [Gk. "to throw both ways"]
Def: confusing an argument by the grammar of the sentence;
Ex: "Croesus, you will destroy a great kingdom!" (your own!)
Composition:
Def: assuming that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole;
Ex: "Chlorine is a poison; sodium is a poison; so NaCl must be a poison too;"
"Micro-evolution is true (change within species); so macro-evolution must be true
too (abiogenesis [life arising from non-life] and transmutation of species]."
Division:
Def: assuming that what is true of whole must be true of the parts;
Ex: "The Lakers are a great team, so every player must be great too."
Equivocation:
Def: confusing the argument by using words with more than one definition;
Ex: "You are really hot on the computer, so you’d better go cool off."
C. Fallacies of Form
Apriorism (’hasty generalization’):
Def: leaping from one experience to a general conclusion;
Ex: "Willy was rude to me. Boys are so mean!"
Complex question (‘loaded question’):
Def: framing the question so as to force a single answer;
Ex: "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
Either/or (‘false dilemma’):
Def: limiting the possible answers to only two; oversimplification;
Ex: "If you think that, you must be either stupid or half-asleep."
Petitio principii (‘begging the question’; ‘circular reasoning’):
Def: assuming what must be proven;
Ex: "Rock music is better than classical music because classical music is not as good."
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (‘false cause’): "after this, therefore because of this."
Def: assuming that a temporal sequence proves a causal relationship;
Ex: "I saw a great movie before my test; that must be why I did so well."
It's true that during a debate on an issue if you simply point out your "opponent" a logical fallacy that he/she has just made, it generally gives you the upper hand. But then, merely having the upper hand is not the goal, truth is. Nevertheless, logical fallacies hide the truth, so pointing them out is very useful. Good luck!
"The vanity of intelligence is that the intelligent man is often more committed to 'one-upping' his opponent than being truthful. When the idea of intelligenve, rather than intelligence itself, becomes a staple, ther is no wisdom in it."